The place where I did see some change is Hubpages. There has been some real hand wringing by noobs around the world over their Hubs. TKA has several forum threads with noobs (and not so noobs) bemoaning the fact that their crappy (and not so crappy) Hubs have taken a nosedive. Discussions on the Hubpages forums reflect this too. All this business about seeing so many little blue arrows … I’m beginning to wonder if these people actually looked at their stats. The Hubpages stats are NOT accurate! I’ve never been able to figure out what they are basing those little arrows on anyway. The only thing that I can think of is that they are measuring traffic over a much smaller period of time than what I am. In the past, when I’ve seen those little blue arrows (or little red arrows,) I’ve gone to my Google Analytics and checked to see what is going on. In most cases the blip in the traffic stats is so minor that it will hardly show on a weekly averaged graph. In most cases, I’m convinced that those little red arrows (supposed to indicate an increase in traffic,) are nothing more than some students in some high school somewhere getting an assignment on … bench cushions or bar stools … or purple throw rugs. lol. You will see a little red arrow today as they all try to figure out what to write about and blue arrows tomorrow when the assignment is over. What I mean by all this is: the Hubpages arrow system is grossly inaccurate. Use your Google Analytics instead to have a true indication about what is going on with your Hubs.
Now about this latest algo change. My Hub earnings actually bounced up for about 4 days but have now settled back down to where they were. No change. When the algo change first hit, I noticed a couple of my money earners actually move up in the SERPS, in fact my main money hub moved into the 1st position in the SERPs for about 24 hours. Then they all settled back down to where they were. (That is where the blue arrows came from – they went up initially, then dropped … giving the little blue arrows.)
Looking at the graph:
- Monday the 21st traffic was normal.
- Tuesday, when the Algo change hit, my Hub traffic bounced up as a couple of my Hubs moved up in the SERPs.
- Wednesday things were beginning to settle down.
- By Thursday, everything was back to normal.
So, in short, from my perspective … the Google Algo change has not affected my Hubs at all. This begs the question … why were some peoples Hubs hit with major losses and others (me) not?
Quality? I don’t think it has anything to do with quality. I’m sure Google in their desire to rule the interwebs would love to say that they can pick a badly written/poor quality Hub out of a group of well written Hubs. They can’t. NOOBS – BELIEVE ME … THEY CANNOT TELL YOUR CRAPPY HUBS FROM YOUR WELL WRITTEN HUBS!!! The ONLY time when quality comes into play is when you get a human inspection. When the algo is looking at your pages – it cannot tell if this was your Masters Thesis or some spun piece of crap. Out of my approximately 300 hubs across 5 different user logins, some are really thin 200 word pieces of crap and others are beautiful well composed Hubs about my passion topics. They did not single out my crap Hubs and boost my good Hubs … so, as much as Google would like the world to believe they are increasing the quality of their search results, it ain’t true.
Backlinks? Where your backlinks come from should not have any impact on the PR of your site, but it can effect your position in the SERPs. If Google decides one day to kill the value of all the links in the BMR (Build My Rank) net farm, and all you used was BMR backlinks, your site will take a tumble in the SERPs. There have been several link selling schemes in the past that have been targeted by Google and had all their sites deindexed. When your backlinks get deindexed, your site will naturally fall in the SERPs. My Hubs are backlinked with everything from TKA Postrunner to Backlinks Philippines and everything in between. Some of my larger hubs have a lot of links coming from scraper sites too. Yet, with all my crappy backlinks – nothing changed. Now, it is possible that some Hub owners have been building backlinks from some site or sites that got deindexed in the latest change … it is possible, but knowing the habits of Hub owners at TKA anyway, I don’t think so. So, I don’t think backlinks have much to do with any losses in the latest algo change.
Length? Nope. I have long and I have short Hubs – nothing has changed.
Google Adsense or Analytics code? Possibly. Google has been known to target whole accounts based on the Adsense code. The only thing I would say on that, is if they were targeting Adsense or Analytics codes, then how would that help them in their effort to eliminate link farms? To me, that would seem more like a tool they would use to eliminate an account that is violating their TOS or someone using Black Hat (whatever that is these days) methods of creating or linking content. In this round of algo changes, I don’t think this is the case.
So what is it? Why have some Hub owners noticed major changes and other none?
Here is my theory … by User.
Somehow, someway Google has targeted specific users. I strongly suspect that Hubpages is working with Google and supplying them with user information. It seems that some users were hit hard across all their Hubs and others saw little or no change. The only difference from one users hub to the next hub is the User name … correct me if I’m wrong on this. So when Mary sees a 50% drop in traffic and John see’s a 0% change in his traffic … and the only difference between their Hubs is the User name, then Google (and Hubpages I suspect) are beginning to target Users.
Why one user and not the next? I have no clue … maybe age … maybe some other ‘social’ factor like how many followers a Hub User has, or author score … really, I have no clue.
Anyone else have any theories?
- What Google is saying about the Algo change.
- What Hubpages is saying about the Algo change.
- Check out Allyn at Blogger Illustrated pointing out to Google what a farce this whole algo update has been.

